Jake Paul vs Nate Diaz: Pay Per View, Not Boxing

Published on 5 August 2023 at 08:11

 "The Jake Paul vs. Nate Diaz Boxing Match: A Disgrace to Boxing and the UFC's Role"

This weekend serves to be a showcase for Jake and Logan Paul. Both brothers have high profile simulated combat events this weekend. Logan Paul takes on high flying, gravity defying, aerial assassin Ricochet in a grudge match at WWE Summerslam. Jake duels grizzled MMA veteran, Nate Diaz, in a DAZN match.

Wait! Jake Paul vs Nate Diaz is being billed as a real fight. That can't possibly be true. Surely a 26 year old Jake Paul, who is fresh off a defeat to Tommy Fury, isn't trying to regain some vestige of credibility by taking on a 38 year old non boxer on pay per view. Right?!

The world of combat sports has taken an unexpected turn as the boxing match between Jake Paul and former MMA fighter Nate Diaz becomes a reality. While the spectacle may generate buzz and financial gains, it raises serious questions about the integrity of boxing and the dire financial situation that some MMA fighters find themselves in. This event underscores the need for fair compensation in the UFC to prevent fighters from resorting to farcical post-MMA events to sustain their livelihoods.


The Spectacle of Jake Paul vs. Nate Diaz:

The allure of the Jake Paul vs. Nate Diaz matchup lies in its novelty and entertainment value. Yet, this spectacle also risks undermining the essence of boxing. Boxing, a sport built on technique, strategy, and years of dedicated training, is being overshadowed by the allure of celebrity and social media influencers entering the ring. This detracts from the legitimacy of boxing as a true athletic pursuit, cheapening the efforts of professional boxers.


UFC's Role in Fighter Pay:

The UFC has often come under fire for its fighter pay structure. Many MMA fighters struggle to make ends meet due to relatively low payouts, especially when compared to the financial rewards that professional boxers receive. As a result, fighters are driven to explore alternative avenues, such as participating in events like the Paul vs. Diaz match, to earn the compensation they deserve. This dynamic exposes the harsh reality that fighters often need to seek outside opportunities to secure their livelihoods.


The Exploitative Cycle:

The cycle of MMA fighters turning to non-traditional fights to bolster their income is indicative of a larger problem. By participating in events that cater more to entertainment than true athletic competition, fighters risk becoming pawns in a spectacle that undermines their skills and dedication. This can perpetuate the notion that fighters' worth lies more in their celebrity status than their fighting prowess, leading to further imbalances in compensation.


A Call for Change:

The boxing match between Jake Paul and Nate Diaz serves as a stark reminder of the need for change in combat sports. The UFC, as a dominant force in MMA, must take responsibility for its role in the financial struggles of its fighters. By reevaluating its fighter pay structure and providing fair compensation, the UFC can help fighters focus on their craft without having to resort to gimmicky post-MMA events.



As the Jake Paul vs. Nate Diaz boxing match unfolds, it's important to reflect on the broader implications it has for both boxing and MMA. This spectacle challenges the essence of authentic competition in boxing while shedding light on the pressing issue of fighter compensation in the UFC. By addressing these concerns, combat sports can reclaim their integrity and ensure that fighters are fairly rewarded for their dedication and sacrifices.

Add comment


There are no comments yet.